Review evidence

Verification trail

No claims match the current filter.

Findings

Editorial stances

Superlative, ranking, or comparative language the diff adds. No verdict — a page's own framing isn't fact-checkable — listed so a reviewer can confirm each is a stance the docs should take.

• content/docs/best-practices/_index.md L4 This page indexes Pulumi's best-practices guidance across infrastructure as code, ESC, IDP, and policy in one place. positioning · found by llm-atomic
• content/docs/best-practices/_index.md L6 This page is designed so that both a human reader and an AI assistant working on the reader's behalf can find Pulumi's own best-practices recommendations… positioning · found by llm-holistic
• content/docs/best-practices/_index.md L83 This best-practices index page intentionally does not introduce new normative guidance of its own; that guidance belongs in the guide for the capability it… positioning · found by regex, llm-atomic, llm-holistic

Investigation log

cross-sibling-reads

not run (not in a templated section)

external-claim-verification

15 of 21 claims verified (2 unverifiable, 1 contradicted, 1 framing-drift) · 4 specialists (numerical, cross-reference, capability, framing); 0 cross-specialist corroborations · routed: 0 inline, 18 Pass 1, 2 Pass 2 (verified 0, contradicted 0, unverifiable 2), 1 Pass 3 (verified 0, contradicted 0, unverifiable 1).

cited-claim-spot-checks

2 of 2 cited claims fetched and compared

frontmatter-sweep

ran on body + meta_desc

temporal-trigger-sweep

ran (recency words present in diff; spot-check in-review)

code-execution

not run (no `static/programs/` change)

code-examples-checks

not run (no fenced code blocks in content files)

editorial-balance-pass

not run (not under content/blog/)

Triaged

• {
    "file": "content/docs/best-practices/_index.md",
    "from_bucket": "outstanding",
    "id": "F1",
    "kind": "spurious",
    "note": "`/docs/insights/policy/ci-cd/` is the live path for that page \u2014 the link-integrity check on this PR resolved it, and the neighbouring entry on L57 uses the same `/docs/insights/policy/` prefix without objection. The link text already uses the current Discovery & governance name; the URL slug is not a claim the page makes."
  }

• {
    "file": "content/docs/best-practices/_index.md",
    "from_bucket": "author-answer",
    "id": "F3",
    "kind": "mis-sourced",
    "note": "the sentence on L88-89 was extracted twice; this row restates F2 and is answered by it."
  }

History

1. 2026-09-17T00:45:55Z 7916fb4

   initial review (pending publication)