Verification trail
#1
β
Verified
content/docs/iac/languages-sdks/javascript/_index.md:83
Pulumi supports JavaScript and any other language that compiles to JavaScript and runs on Node.js.
evidence: The Pulumi docs page for this same content states verbatim: "Pulumi supports JavaScript and any other language that compiles to JavaScript and runs on Node.js, our documentation examples are maintained exclusively in TypeScript."; source: https://www.pulumi.com/docs/iac/languages-sdks/javascript/
source: https://www.pulumi.com/docs/iac/languages-sdks/javascript/
pass3
#2
β
Verified
content/docs/iac/languages-sdks/javascript/_index.md:83
Pulumi's documentation examples are maintained exclusively in TypeScript.
evidence: The live Pulumi docs page states verbatim: "our documentation examples are maintained exclusively in TypeScript."; source: https://www.pulumi.com/docs/iac/languages-sdks/javascript/
source: https://www.pulumi.com/docs/iac/languages-sdks/javascript/
pass3
#3
β
Verified
content/docs/iac/languages-sdks/javascript/_index.md:86
Pulumi templates typically include a specific TypeScript version in their `package.json`, which takes precedence over Pulumi's bundled TypeScript compiler.
evidence: The official Pulumi docs page states verbatim: "Pulumi templates typically include a more recent TypeScript version in their package.json, which will take precedence over the bundled version."; source: https://www.pulumi.com/docs/iac/languages-sdks/javascript/
source: https://www.pulumi.com/docs/iac/languages-sdks/javascript/
pass3
#4
π€ Matches
content/docs/iac/languages-sdks/javascript/_index.md:88
The Pulumi SDK reference guide at /docs/reference/pkg/nodejs/pulumi/pulumi/ provides more information about the Pulumi SDK npm package.
evidence: The same internal reference path `/docs/reference/pkg/nodejs/pulumi/pulumi/` is used consistently later in the same file (line 389: "The [Pulumi SDK (`@pulumi/pulumi`)](/docs/reference/pkg/nodejs/pulumi/pulumi/) contains the coreβ¦; source: repo:content/docs/iac/languages-sdks/javascript/_index.md
source: repo:content/docs/iac/languages-sdks/javascript/_index.md
pass1
No claims match the current filter.
Findings
No findings.
Editorial stances
Superlative, ranking, or comparative language the diff adds. No verdict β a page's own framing isn't fact-checkable β listed so a reviewer can confirm each is a stance the docs should take.
- content/docs/iac/languages-sdks/javascript/_index.md L83 Pulumi recommends using TypeScript for the most consistent experience and up-to-date examples. positioning Β· found by llm-holistic
Investigation log
- cross-sibling-reads
- not run (not in a templated section)
- external-claim-verification
- 4 of 4 claims verified (0 unverifiable, 0 contradicted) Β· 4 specialists (numerical, cross-reference, capability, framing); 0 cross-specialist corroborations Β· routed: 0 inline, 1 Pass 1, 0 Pass 2, 3 Pass 3 (verified 3, contradicted 0, unverifiable 0).
- cited-claim-spot-checks
- not run (no cited claims)
- frontmatter-sweep
- ran on body + meta_desc
- temporal-trigger-sweep
- not run (no trigger words)
- code-execution
- not run (no `static/programs/` change)
- code-examples-checks
- not run (no fenced code blocks in content files)
- editorial-balance-pass
- not run (not under content/blog/)
History
- 2026-09-14T14:19:11Z
2eac83a
initial review (pending publication)