Review evidence

Verification trail

No claims match the current filter.

Findings

Editorial stances

Superlative, ranking, or comparative language the diff adds. No verdict — a page's own framing isn't fact-checkable — listed so a reviewer can confirm each is a stance the docs should take.

• content/docs/ai/_index.md L27 Neo is suited for long-running, governed infrastructure tasks, while coding agents are suited for interactive development. positioning · found by llm-atomic
• content/docs/ai/concepts/_index.md L35 - [Settings](/docs/ai/concepts/neo/settings/): Access controls, the default task mode, and notifications. positioning · found by regex
• content/docs/ai/concepts/neo/permissions.md L109 | Approval (task) mode | Review-`manual` / Balanced / Auto | User per task; org admin sets the default | Task UI; `--approval-mode` in the CLI; org default… positioning · found by regex
• content/docs/ai/concepts/neo/settings/index.md L102 1. Select the default mode from the dropdown positioning · found by regex
• content/docs/ai/concepts/neo/settings/index.md L109 Starting with the most restrictive Neo task mode is best for most organizations. positioning · found by llm-atomic
• content/docs/ai/concepts/neo/settings/index.md L109 Starting with the most restrictive Neo task mode (Review mode) is best for most organizations. positioning · found by regex, llm-atomic, llm-holistic
• content/docs/ai/concepts/neo/settings/index.md L5 meta_desc: Configure Neo access controls, model providers, integrations, the default task mode, and notification preferences. positioning · found by regex
• content/docs/ai/concepts/neo/settings/index.md L91 Organization administrators can set the default task mode. The available modes determine how much autonomy Neo has during execution: positioning · found by regex
• content/docs/iac/concepts/converters.md L16 For most conversions, using an LLM is the recommended first option. [Pulumi Neo](/docs/ai/), part of Pulumi Cloud, can convert your infrastructure code using… positioning · found by regex

Investigation log

cross-sibling-reads

0 of 12 siblings

external-claim-verification

226 of 329 claims verified (74 unverifiable, 4 contradicted, 5 framing-drift) · 4 specialists (numerical, cross-reference, capability, framing); 0 cross-specialist corroborations · routed: 0 inline, 302 Pass 1, 6 Pass 2 (verified 3, contradicted 0, unverifiable 3), 21 Pass 3 (verified 19, contradicted 1, unverifiable 1).

cited-claim-spot-checks

6 of 6 cited claims fetched and compared

frontmatter-sweep

ran on body + meta_desc

temporal-trigger-sweep

ran (recency words present in diff; spot-check in-review)

code-execution

not run (no `static/programs/` change)

code-examples-checks

ran (3 specialists: structural, existence, body-code-coverage); 0 findings

editorial-balance-pass

not run (not under content/blog/)

Triaged

• {
    "file": "content/docs/ai/concepts/_index.md",
    "from_bucket": "outstanding",
    "id": "F1",
    "kind": "spurious",
    "note": "`pull-requests/`, `previews/`, and `slash-commands/` are leaf bundles (`index.md`), which the verifier did not look for; the Hugo build is green and all added internal links resolve."
  }

• {
    "file": "content/docs/ai/neo/settings/_index.md",
    "from_bucket": "outstanding",
    "id": "F5",
    "kind": "spurious",
    "note": "the colliding file `content/docs/ai/neo/settings/_index.md` is deleted by this PR and its content is split into `concepts/neo/{settings,instructions,slash-commands}/`, so the collision is a PR-internal move, not a live clash."
  }

• {
    "file": "content/docs/ai/concepts/neo/tasks.md",
    "from_bucket": "author-answer",
    "id": "F52",
    "kind": "spurious",
    "note": "this is a link claim. The target `content/docs/ai/concepts/neo/previews/index.md` exists in this PR, the Hugo build is green, and the added internal links resolve."
  }

• {
    "file": "content/docs/ai/concepts/neo/usage-limits.md",
    "from_bucket": "author-answer",
    "id": "F53",
    "kind": "spurious",
    "note": "this is a link claim. The target `content/docs/ai/concepts/neo/settings/index.md` exists in this PR, the Hugo build is green, and the added internal links resolve."
  }

• {
    "file": "content/docs/ai/concepts/cli-for-agents.md",
    "from_bucket": "reviewer-check",
    "id": "F63",
    "kind": "spurious",
    "note": "verified against the CLI-for-agents sources; nothing left that affects readers."
  }

• {
    "file": "content/docs/ai/concepts/neo/code-reviews.md",
    "from_bucket": "reviewer-check",
    "id": "F66",
    "kind": "spurious",
    "note": "inline line comments are how GitHub PR reviews deliver code-level feedback; no reader impact."
  }

• {
    "file": "content/docs/ai/concepts/neo/code-reviews.md",
    "from_bucket": "reviewer-check",
    "id": "F67",
    "kind": "spurious",
    "note": "verified; the remaining doubt is about how strong the source is, not reader impact."
  }

• {
    "file": "content/docs/ai/concepts/neo/settings/index.md",
    "from_bucket": "reviewer-check",
    "id": "F68",
    "kind": "spurious",
    "note": "the page goes on to cover all three levels (org settings, repository `AGENTS.md`, and user notifications)."
  }

• {
    "file": "content/docs/ai/concepts/neo/settings/index.md",
    "from_bucket": "reviewer-check",
    "id": "F70",
    "kind": "spurious",
    "note": "this matches the approval-mode gates on the permissions page word for word."
  }

• {
    "file": "content/docs/ai/get-started/neo.md",
    "from_bucket": "reviewer-check",
    "id": "F71",
    "kind": "spurious",
    "note": "matches the VCS integration docs; the only doubt is how independent the source is, and that doesn't affect readers."
  }

• {
    "file": "content/docs/ai/get-started/neo.md",
    "from_bucket": "reviewer-check",
    "id": "F72",
    "kind": "spurious",
    "note": "the claim matches the permissions page section linked in the same paragraph (L68 of `permissions.md`)."
  }

• {
    "file": "content/docs/ai/get-started/neo.md",
    "from_bucket": "reviewer-check",
    "id": "F73",
    "kind": "spurious",
    "note": "verified; the remaining doubt is about UI labels only, and the text came over unchanged from the old get-started page."
  }

History

1. 2026-10-22T18:06:37Z 6467df3

   initial review (pending publication)

2. 2026-10-22T20:31:02Z a0f9eccbc8

   Author pushed fixes in 5dd6e0e and a0f9ecc; F2–F4 and reviewer checks F6–F8, F62, F64, F65, F69 verified resolved